Can U Bring a Baby in Eastern State Hospital

You know near how individuals gain command of the power of the State and then abuse that ability like erstwhile US President George "Dubya" Bush?  "Dubya" started a war in Republic of iraq which was highly assisting for some U.s.a. businesses.  He achieved this b y claiming Republic of iraq had a nuclear weapons program which was a serious world security threat when Iraq did not and when it had already been bombed into oblivion by the state of war his Dad George Bush Snr waged on Iraq in 1992: Valerie Plame Wilson: the housewife CIA spy who was 'fair game' for Bush-league UK The Telegraph Past Chrissy Iley 15 Feb 2011.

Remember how Bush was supported past UK Premier Tony Blair who helped past persuading the British Parliament to join the United states with faked "intelligence" of Iraq's weapons of mass destruction which did not exist but which Blair claimed could be deployed inside xl minutes and posed a serious security threat?

If you remember that then you will know how these kinds of people manipulate the media.  Detect how they persuade us nosotros are in imminent danger of some threat or other and that they can relieve us all if we trust them?

This trickery is not new.  It had been used for well over a century with smallpox.  The myth continues to this twenty-four hours.

On CHS we wrote previously most how unscientific the claim is that smallpox was eradicated past vaccination when that bluntly is nonsense scientifically.  The demise of the disease came virtually as a result of the interaction of three completely different factors: isolation, attenuation and improved living conditions, particularly nutrition and sanitation. The effect cannot be attributable to the smallpox vaccine – whatsoever vaccine which takes over 100 years to work ipso facto proves itself not to have:

Small Pox – Big Prevarication – Bioterrorism Implications of Flawed Theories of Eradication

At that place was a nasty disease called smallpox and it did kill people long ago.

This was particularly the case when the poor moved to the cities during the industrial revolution looking for work and choked them in overcrowded unsanitary slums ripe for breeding and spreading affliction: London's outset park congenital after rich feared disease spread from slums U.k. The Independent Past Andy McSmith Fri 07 Nov 2008; Hygiene History in the Industrialized World.

The centre and upper classes needed to be reassured the Country would proceed them rubber from the threat of disease.  The majority of the population of entire countries were persuaded their States could achieve this by ensuring the and then truly "smashing unwashed" masses would be vaccinated and the disease controlled.  The trouble was this was a myth but the people wanted to believe and were persuaded.

Smallpox vaccination did non work and sometimes killed as many or more than than the disease itself whilst many of the "vaccinated" still contracted the illness: Smallpox Bloodshed, Uk, Usa, Sweden.

Now you can read a relatively short just well-referenced history of the myth of vaccination and the myth of its role in the eradication of smallpox:

Online Version – Vaccination: A Mythical History ~ by Roman Bystrianyk and Suzanne Humphries MD – August 27, 2013

SMALLPOX Bloodshed- Britain, USA & SWEDEN

In the graphs below discover the big numbers of deaths acquired by the smallpox vaccine itself.  By 1901 in the UK, more people died from the smallpox vaccination than from smallpox itself.  The severity of the disease dimished with improved living standards and was not vanquished by vaccination, as the medical "consensus" view tells us. Any vaccine which takes 100 years to "work" did non.  On any scientific assay of the history and data, crediting smallpox vaccine for the decline in smallpox appears misplaced.

When during 1880-1908 the Metropolis of Leicester in England stopped vaccination compared to the residue of the UK and elsewhere, its survival rates soared and smallpox death rates plummeted [see tabular array below].  Leicester's approach besides cost far less.

[Click Graph to Enlarge – Opens In New Window]

[Click Graph to Enlarge – Opens In New Window]

Extracts from "LEICESTER: Sanitation versus Vaccination" By J.T. Biggs J.P.

[Download Unabridged Book every bit .pdf 43 Mb  – Or Read Online]

Table 21

SMALLPOX FATALITY RATES, cases in vaccinated and re-vaccinated populations compared with "unprotected" Leicester – 1860 to 1908.

Name.	Period.	Pocket-size-Pox.  Cases	Small-Pox. Deaths.	Fatality-rate per cent. of Cases
Japan	1886-1908	288,779	77,415	26.8
British Army (United Kingdom)	1860-1908	one,355	96	7.ane
British Army (India)	1860-1908	ii,753	307	11.i
British Army (Colonies)	1860-1908	934	82	eight.8
Royal Navy	1860-1908	2,909	234	eight.0
Grand Totals and case fatality charge per unit per cent, over all		296,730	78,134	26.3
Leicester (since giving upwardly vaccination)	1880-1908	1,206	61	5.1

Biggs said "In this comparison, I accept given the numbers of revaccinated cases, and deaths, and each fatality-rate separately and together, and then that they may be compared either way with Leicester. In pro-vaccinist linguistic communication, may I ask, if the excessive pocket-sized-pox fatality of Japan, of the British Army, and of the Royal Navy, are not due to vaccination and revaccination, to what are they due? It would afford an interesting psychical report were we able to know to what heights of eloquent glorification Sir George Buchanan would have soared with a corresponding issue—but on the contrary side."

TABLE 29.

Small-Pox Epidemics, Cost, and Fatality Rates Compared

	Vaccinal Condition	Small-Pox Cases	Small-Pox Deaths	Fatality-rate Per Cent	Toll of Epidemic
London 1900-02	Well Vaccinated	9,659	1,594	16.fifty	£492,000
Glasgow 1900-02	Well Vaccinated	iii,417	377	eleven.03	£ 150,000
Sheffield 1887-88	Well Vaccinated	7,066	688	9.73	£32,257
Leicester 1892-94	Practically Unvaccinated	393	21	5.34	£ii,888
Leicester 1902-04	Practically Unvaccinated	731	30	4.10	£1,602

[Click Graph to Enlarge – Opens In New Window]

[Click Graph to Enlarge – Opens In New Window]

[Click Graph to Enlarge – Opens In New Window]

__________________________________________

Vaccination: A Mythical History ~ past Roman Bystrianyk and Suzanne Humphries Doc

– August 27, 2013

With the approaching influenza season and the enthusiastic calls to use the influenza vaccine, you lot might be wondering where the thought of vaccination got its first. Where did the idea of injecting whole or $.25 of microbes and other substances into people in an attempt to provide protection confronting contagious affliction begin?

Many medical and history books present a unproblematic tale of the origin of vaccination. Most present the same bones tale of the vivid observation of a simple country doctor and his courage in attempting to thwart a deadly and frightening illness of that time – smallpox, or as it was often called the speckled monster. In a contempo and pop book, The Panic Virus, the author reiterates this classic tale.

In 1796, Jenner enlisted a milkmaid named Sarah Nelmes and an viii-twelvemonth old boy named James Phipps to test his theory. Jenner transferred pus from Nelmes'southward cowpox blisters onto incisions he'd fabricated in Phipps'south hands. The boy came downwardly with a slight fever, only nothing more. Later, Jenner gave Phipps a standard smallpox inoculation – which should accept resulted in a total-blown, albeit balmy, instance of the disease. Nothing happened. Jenner tried inoculating Phipps with smallpox once more; once again, nothing. [1]

Edward Jenner's thought eventually became known as vaccination, which is derived from the Latin give-and-take for cow – vacca. It was originally referred to as cowpoxing, but eventually the term vaccination was adopted. Equally the story goes, with this invention in identify, smallpox would be tamed and the earth would be freed from the terror of the illness.

Such is the stuff of legends. The story is not unlike the classic Greek legends of Theseus defeating the child-devouring Minotaur, or Perseus beheading the deadly snake-headed Medusa, or many other classic stories of the dauntless hero defeating a deadly enemy. The Jenner fable has been reduced to a elementary and memorable story of a hero defeating the mortiferous enemy, smallpox. Authors merits that with vaccination in place, "billions of lives" have been saved.[2]

But legendary heroes, specially those that are used to back up a belief, achieve an iconic status while any unsavory aspects almost the hero and the story are ignored or forgotten. Mythical tales are designed to evoke a positive emotional response to influence societal thinking.

The tale of defeating smallpox begins well before the story of our hero. It begins with the concept of using small amounts of smallpox pus and scratching information technology into the arms of good for you people. This thought was introduced to the Western earth by Lady Mary Wortley Montagu in 1717. She had returned from the Ottoman Empire with knowledge of the practise of inoculation against smallpox, known as variolation. This type of inoculation was simply a matter of infecting a person with smallpox at a fourth dimension and in a setting of his choosing. The idea behind inoculation was that, in a controlled setting, people would do improve against the affliction than if they contracted it at some perchance less desirable time and identify in the hereafter.

The idea was embraced by the medical profession and enthusiastically practiced. But considering of the complexity and danger involved, inoculation remained an operation that could only exist afforded by the wealthy.[3] The procedure did often assistance protect the individual that was inoculated, only there was however an estimated 2-5% that died as a result.[4,5] Still, this was an improvement compared to a 20-25% mortality rate in those that had naturally contracted smallpox during an epidemic.[6] But, was the departure in bloodshed due to inoculation alone? Or could it take had something to do with the fact that the wealthy had better access to more nutritious food and a cleaner surroundings than the majority of society?

At that place was 1 major and generally unacknowledged drawback to variolation – those inoculated could and did spread smallpox creating more deaths than there would have been naturally. In a 1764 commodity the author recognized that smallpox was a contagious disease and that the practise of variolation would create new vectors to spread it. He compared the smallpox deaths in the 38 years before the introduction of variolation to the 38 years subsequently, and found that smallpox deaths had increased⎯non decreased. He was forced to conclude that variolation on the whole, led to worse issues, because information technology acquired more deaths than lives saved.

It is incontestably like the plague a contagious disease, what tends to stop the progress of the infection tends to lessen the danger that attends it; what tends to spread the contagion, tends to increase that danger; the do of Inoculation manifestly tends to spread the contamination, for a contagious affliction is produced by Inoculation where it would not otherwise have been produced; the place where it is thus produced becomes a heart of contagion, whence it spreads not less fatally or widely than it would spread from a center where the affliction should happen in a natural way; these centers of contagion are manifestly multiplied very profoundly by Inoculation . . .[7]

However, while the popularity of variolation varied, the trouble of it spreading smallpox, was largely unrecognized. Considering variolation had become a very lucrative procedure it was enthusiastically continued by nearly of the medical profession through the 1700s and into the early 1800s. Smallpox connected to be spread past this medically-sanctioned procedure.

At present enters the hero of our legend. It was rumored among milkmaids that infection with cowpox would protect one from smallpox. In 1796, believing these stories, Edward Jenner performed an experiment on an eight-year-old boy named James Phipps. He took illness matter that he believed to be cowpox from lesions on a dairymaid, Sarah Nelmes, and vaccinated James Phipps with it. He later deliberately exposed the kid to smallpox every bit a test to meet if he was protected by the cowpox inoculation. When the male child did not contract clinical smallpox, it was assumed that the technique of vaccination was successful.

In 1798 Jenner published his results claiming lifelong protection confronting smallpox using his discovery with simply rumors to support his contention. While he promoted the use of his technique based on the tale that someone infected with cowpox would be immune to smallpox, at that place were doctors of the time who challenged this myth, because they had seen smallpox follow cowpox. At a meeting of the Medico-Convivial Society, Jenner was ridiculed over his practice.

But he [Jenner] no sooner mentioned it than they laughed at it. The cow doctors could have told him of hundreds of cases where small-scale-pox had followed cow-pox . . . [eight]

From the beginning there were problems with Jenner's procedure. In 1799, Mr. Drake vaccinated a number of children with cowpox matter obtained from Edward Jenner. The children were then tested past being inoculated with smallpox to meet if the cowpox procedure had been constructive. All of them developed smallpox, and vaccination failed to protect whatever of them. Jenner received the written report but decided to ignore the results because they were not in support of his theory.[9]

Vaccination was apace embraced by many in the medical profession every bit the answer to combating smallpox. By 1801, an estimated 100,000 people had already been vaccinated in England with the belief that the procedure would produce lifelong protection. The medical community continued to embrace Jenner'south ideas amidst numerous accounts that refuted the theory of vaccination. Early on reports indicated that there were cases of people who had cowpox, or were vaccinated, and were nonetheless dying of smallpox. Specific cases of cowpox and vaccine failure were reported in the 1809 Medical Observer.

A Kid was vaccinated by Mr. Robinson, surgeon and apothecary, at Rotherham, towards the cease of the year 1799. A month later it was inoculated with pocket-size-pox thing without effect, and a few months subsequently took confluent small-pox and died. 2. A woman-servant to Mr. Take chances, of Bungay, in Suffolk, had moo-cow-pox in the coincidental way from milking. Seven years after she became nurse to Yarmouth Infirmary, where she defenseless small-pox, and died. 3 and 4. Elizabeth and John Nicholson, three years of age, were vaccinated at Battersea in the summer of 1804. Both contracted small-pox in May, 1805 and died . . . 13. The child of Mr. R died of pocket-sized-pox in October 1805. The patient had been vaccinated, and the parents were assured of its security. The vaccinator's proper name was concealed. 14. The child of Mr. Hindsley at Mr. Adam's function . . . died of small-pox a year after vaccination.[10]

Reports through the early on 1800s began to accumulate showing vaccination was non living up to its hope to protect from smallpox. A written report in 1810 from the Medical Observer noted 535 cases of small-pox after vaccination, 97 fatal cases, and 150 cases of vaccine injuries.[11] Note that 97 deaths out of 535 cases is an 18% fatality rate and is essentially the same fatality charge per unit as smallpox before vaccination was introduced. This high fatality rate forth with 150 vaccine-related injuries was a direct claiming to this new and highly lauded medical procedure.

Another article in 1817 reflected the reality of vaccination failure.

. . . the number of all ranks suffering under Small Pox, who accept previously undergone Vaccination by the most skillful practitioners, is at nowadays alarmingly great.[12]

In 1818 Thomas Brown, a surgeon with thirty years of feel in Musselburgh, Scotland, published an commodity discussing his experience with vaccination. He stated that he was originally extremely positive in promoting vaccination and that no one in the medical profession "could outstrip me in zeal for promoting vaccine practice." But after vaccinating 1,200 persons, he became disappointed in the promise of vaccination. His experience was that, after vaccination, people still could contract and even die from smallpox, and that he could no longer support the practice.[thirteen]

Like today, surgeons and doctors of the time were handsomely compensated for performing vaccination and thus had a tendency to comprehend information technology as a new form of income. It is therefore quite significant for a doctor to take spoken out against information technology as Dr. Brown did.

Connected observations showed that smallpox could nonetheless infect those who previously had smallpox and that those who were vaccinated could also be infected.

. . . during the years 1820, 1, and, 2 [1820-1822] there was a great hubbub about the small-scale-pox. It broke out with the neat epidemic to the due north . . . Information technology pressed close to home to Dr. Jenner himself . . . Information technology attacked many who had had pocket-sized-pox before, and oft severely; nigh to death; and of those who had been vaccinated, it left some lonely, but fell upon bully numbers.[14]

William Cobbett was a farmer, announcer, and English pamphleteer. In 1829 he wrote most the failure of vaccination to protect people from smallpox. Cobbett considered vaccination to exist an unproven and fraudulent medical practice. He noted that:

. . . hundreds of instances, persons cow-poxed past JENNER HIMSELF, have taken the real small-pox afterwards, and have either died from the disorder, or narrowly escaped with their lives![xv]

During this fourth dimension vaccine textile was the "humanized" form, which meant that material was taken from the arm of a previously vaccinated person to vaccinate the next person. Arm-to-arm vaccination continued for decades, but as failures increased there was a belief that the vaccine had lost its original supposed potency, and at that place were calls to obtain fresh textile directly from cows.[16]

While the legend maintained that the vaccine material came from cows, Jenner actually believed the fabric originated from an infectious condition of horses chosen the "grease." From this and other beliefs, at that place were many attempts to recreate an original moo-cow-based vaccine. All these attempts failed.[17] Some believed that cowpox was simply smallpox that was passed through cows and somehow fabricated into a new illness.[xviii] This faulty conventionalities would result in the cosmos of more smallpox epidemics.

In 1836 in Attenborough, Massachusetts, Dr. John C. Martin took fluid from the pock of a human who died from smallpox and inoculated it onto a cow'due south udder. He then took pus from that moo-cow and used it to vaccinate people. A large smallpox epidemic ensued causing panic and sickness in many people over the subsequent months.[19] A later research determined that this was cipher more than than the onetime practice of smallpox inoculation.[xx]

Not only was vaccination failing and causing smallpox epidemics, only there were also reports of deaths from other causes soon after vaccination. For example, a peel condition called erysipelas was a particularly prolonged and painful style to die.

. . . a boy from Somers-town, aged 5 years, "pocket-sized-pox confluent, unmodified (9 days)." He had been vaccinated at the historic period of iv months; one cicatrix . . . the wife of a labourer, from Lambeth, anile 22 years, "modest-pox confluent, unmodified (8 days)." Vaccinated in infancy in Suffolk; two good cicatrices . . . the son of a mariner, aged 10 weeks, and the son of a carbohydrate bakery, anile 13 weeks, died of "general erysipelas after vaccination, effusion of the brain."[21]

Because arm-to-arm vaccination was beingness used, other diseases could be spread causing various epidemics. Infectious diseases attributed to vaccination included tuberculosis and syphilis. In 1863 Dr. Ricord spoke before the Academy at Paris.

Start I rejected the thought that syphilis could be transplanted by vaccination. But facts accumulated more than and more, and at present I must concede the possibility of the transfer of syphilis by means of the vaccine. I exercise this very reluctantly. At present I do not hesitate longer to admit and proclaim the reality of the fact.[22]

As it became increasingly clear throughout the 1800s to more doctors and citizens that vaccination was not what it was promised to be, refusals increased. In society to deal with this, the judicial organisation intervened. In 1855, Massachusetts created a set of comprehensive laws providing for widespread vaccination.[23]

These laws and compulsory vaccination did null to curb the problem of smallpox. Data from Boston that begins in 1811 shows that, starting around 1837, there were periodic smallpox epidemics that culminated in the great 1872 epidemic. After 1855, there were further smallpox epidemics in 1859-lx, 1864-65, and 1867 and the infamous epidemic in 1872-73. This was the most astringent smallpox epidemic since the introduction of vaccination.[24] These repeat smallpox epidemics showed that the strict vaccination laws instituted by Massachusetts in 1855 had no consequence at all (Graph 1). In fact, more than people died in the 20 years after the strict Massachusetts vaccination compulsory laws than in the 20 years before.

Graph ane: Boston smallpox mortality rate from 1841 to 1880.

Past this point, the medical profession no longer claimed lifelong protection against smallpox from a single vaccination. Instead, claims were made that vaccination made smallpox less probable to kill or that smallpox would be milder. Calls were then made for revaccination. Claims were made that revaccination had to be performed anywhere from yearly to every ten years.[25]

While the bulk of the medical profession supported vaccination, there were those that spoke out against the procedure. Dr. Longstaffe, a prominent physician of Edinburgh England noted that huge profits were existence fabricated past vaccinators. Immense fiscal proceeds combined with the forcefulness of law created the perfect environment that would impose vaccination upon the citizens of the Western world.

The public vaccinators have received immense sums from Parliament . . . In 1850 lone they amounted to £54,727, and in the present year they will get about a quarter one thousand thousand. Other sums, besides, which I cannot name, have been granted for the purpose of sustaining this monstrous fraud. Has ever a quack remedy produced and then much gain?

[26]

In England, governmental control strengthened over the years, with progressively stricter laws designed to enforce vaccination. Laws previously passed in 1840 and 1853 were consolidated into oppressive compulsory laws in 1867 that included fines for parents who did not vaccinate their children. Withal, through the 1800s, periodic smallpox epidemics continued to occur. A great pandemic struck in 1872 and took the lives of thousands, even those who were vaccinated.

Every recruit that enters the French regular army is vaccinated. During the Franco-Prussian state of war there were twenty-three chiliad four hundred and sixty-nine cases of small-pox in that army. The London Lancet of July 15, 1871 said:

Of ix k iii hundred and ninety-two pocket-size-pox patients in London hospitals, six thousand eight hundred and fifty-four had been vaccinated. Seventeen and one-half per cent of those attacked died. In the whole country more than one hundred and twenty-two thou vaccinated persons have suffered from pocket-sized-pox . . . Official returns from Germany show that between 1870 and 1885 one million vaccinated persons died from small-pox.[27]

Concerns over vaccine prophylactic, effectiveness, and governmental infringement on personal liberty and freedom through compulsory vaccination stoked the fires of the anti-vaccine movement. People began to resist the regime and chose to pay fines. Some even accepted imprisonment rather than allowing vaccination for themselves or their children. The public backfire culminated in the great demonstration in Leicester England, in 1885. That same year Leicester's government, which had pushed for vaccination through the use of fines and jail time, was replaced with a new government that was opposed to compulsory vaccination. By 1887, the vaccination coverage rates had dropped to 10%.[28]

Instead of relying on vaccination, people began to rely on proper sanitation, quarantine of smallpox patients and thorough disinfection of their homes. They believed this technique was a inexpensive and effective means that eliminated the need for vaccination. However, there were dire predictions from the majority of the medical community that strongly endorsed vaccination and believed the low vaccination charge per unit would effect in a terrible "massacre," especially in the "unprotected" children.[29]

Despite such prophesies of doom from the medical profession, the majority of the town's residents were steadfast in their belief that vaccination was non necessary to control smallpox. The prophecy that the Leicester residents would eventually be plagued with disaster never did come to pass. Low vaccination rates resulted in lower smallpox rates and deaths, than in well-vaccinated towns.[thirty] In fact, the lower vaccination rates correlated to an overall decrease in smallpox deaths (Graph 2). Leicester showed that by abandoning vaccination in favor of what became termed as the "Leicester Method," deaths from smallpox were far lower than when vaccination rates were loftier.

The feel of unvaccinated Leicester is an eye-opener to the people and an centre-sore to the pro-vaccinists the globe over. Hither is a great manufacturing town having a population of nearly a quarter of a million, which has demonstrated by a crucial exam of an experience extending over a period of more than a quarter of a century, that an unvaccinated population has been far less susceptible to small-pox and far less affected by that disease since it abandoned vaccination than it was at a fourth dimension when xc-five per cent of its births were vaccinated and its adult population well re-vaccinated.[31]

While vaccination was ofttimes promoted every bit a safe procedure, it frequently caused sickness or fifty-fifty death. From 1859 to 1922 official deaths related to vaccination were more than 1,600 in England (Graph three). In fact, from 1906 to 1922 the number of deaths recorded from smallpox vaccination and smallpox were approximately the same (Graph 4).

Graph 2: Leicester England smallpox mortality rate vs. vaccination coverage from 1838 to 1910.

Graph 3: England and Wales total deaths from cowpox and other furnishings of vaccination from 1859 to 1922.

Graph 4: England and Wales smallpox deaths vs. vaccination deaths from 1906 to 1922

At the end of the 1800s, smallpox changed its character. Afterwards the summertime of 1897, the severe type of smallpox with its high death rate, with rare exception, had entirely disappeared from the United states of america. Smallpox turned from a affliction that killed ane in five of its victims to i that only killed anywhere from ane in fifty and later to as depression as 1 in 380. The disease could withal kill, merely having become so much milder, it was oftentimes mistaken for diverse other pox infections or skin eruptions.

During 1896 a very mild type of smallpox began to prevail in the Due south and later gradually spread over the land. The bloodshed was very low and information technology [smallpox] was commonly at showtime mistaken for chicken pox. . .[32]

The author of a 1913 article in The Journal of Infectious Diseases presented a table showing that in 1895 and 1896 the smallpox expiry rate was effectually 20%, as it had been historically. The tabular array too showed that after 1896 the death rate fell off rapidly, starting with 6% in 1897 to as low equally 0.26% by 1908. As the mild course of smallpox replaced the classic type, smallpox could be difficult to tell from chickenpox, which was, by this fourth dimension, considered a balmy illness of childhood.

. . . chickenpox, is a small-scale catching illness of childhood, and is importantly important considering it frequently gives ascent to difficulty in diagnosis in cases of mild smallpox. Smallpox and chickenpox are sometimes very difficult to differentiate clinically.[33]

By the 1920s it was recognized that the new course of smallpox produced little in the style of symptoms, even though few had been vaccinated.

Individual cases, or even epidemics, occur in which, although there has been no protection by vaccination, the course of the disease is extremely mild. The lesions are few in number or entirely absent, and the constitutional symptoms balmy or insignificant.[34]

Despite this extremely low vaccine coverage rate, at that place was never a resurgence of smallpox. Even though smallpox was not a major event, the practice of smallpox vaccination connected from the time of the last smallpox death in the United States in 1948 upwardly until 1963. This resulted in an estimated 5,000 unnecessary vaccine-related hospitalizations from generalized rash, secondary infections, and encephalitis.

A 1958 study detailed the cases of 9 children in which two died of a skin condition due to vaccination, at present being termed eczema vaccinatum. The occurrence of this disease was estimated past the authors to exist betwixt 1 in 20,000 to 1 in 100,000 with a fatality rate of 4 to 40%.[35] Notwithstanding, they acknowledged that most cases were not reported and there was no accurate accounting on this upshot of vaccination. There were too an estimated 200 to 300 deaths as the consequence of smallpox vaccination, while during the same time there had but been one smallpox decease in 1948.[36]

The final smallpox decease in the The states following an importation occurred in 1948, just since that fourth dimension there take been probably 200 to 300 deaths from smallpox vaccination.[37]

Eczema vaccinatum is still occurring today, equally recently noted in the news. A toddler was infected by his military male parent after the father was vaccinated. After a prolonged admission, and a week of experimental treatments including immune globulin from donor claret and antiviral medication, the toddler recovered. The mother also required treatment and virus was found all over the business firm.[38]

Because of poor surveillance and vaccine reaction underreporting, the authors of a 1970 study thought that the number of smallpox vaccine-related deaths could really have been even higher. This study merely examined deaths from 1959 to 1968 in the United States. If the deaths were this high in a country with a modern health-intendance system, what was the total number of deaths from smallpox vaccination from 1800 to the present across the unabridged world?

There were those in the medical customs who were relieved that the failure of compulsory vaccination never gained much public scrutiny. Instead, the focus was shifted to new types of vaccinations.

Compulsory vaccination which once had the suffrage of the nation has now hardly a serious supporter. Nosotros are ashamed to jettison the thought completely and perhaps afraid that if we did the accident of some hereafter epidemic might put us in the wrong. We prefer to permit compulsory vaccination die a natural decease and are relieved that the full general public is not curious enough to demand an inquest. In the concurrently our attention is diverted to other and newer forms of immunisation.[39]

During this time with vaccination every bit virtually the only medically promoted way to bargain with disease, at that place were doctors finding astonishing successes with smallpox using other methods. Vinegar is a common food product that is made through fermentation of a variety of sources. An 1877 article described the success that Dr. Roth had using vinegar for smallpox prophylaxis.

D. G. Oliphant, M.D., of Toronto, Canada, having read the article on the use of Acetic acid in ruby-red fever, writes of a "vinegar cure" equally applied to small pox. Dr. Roth kickoff claimed wonderful success in treatment regarding vinegar more reliable every bit a prophylactic in small-pox than Belladonna in scarlet fever. Dr. Roth gave both to the sick and to the exposed two tabular array-spoonfuls of vinegar, later on breakfast and at evening, for 14 days. Few persons thus treated took the disease at all. None who adopted the prophylactic handling died, while amongst those under ordinary treatment the mortality was as usual.[40]

In 1899 Dr. Howe as well demonstrated vinegar'due south ability to protect a person from acquiring smallpox. Those who used the vinegar protocol were able to take care of other people with smallpox without fear of contracting the affliction. The author notes that despite several hundred exposures, vinegar was protective against smallpox and was considered an "established fact."[41]

Again, in 1901 professor MacLean promoted the idea of vinegar every bit a real preventative of smallpox. Dr. MacLean claimed that apple cider vinegar and no other type of vinegar should be used three or four times a day to protect a person from contracting smallpox.

J.P. MacLean Ph. D., the renowned "anti" Secretary of the Western Reserve Historical Society, having readily overthrown the conclusions of all the great men who for a century past take been convinced of the efficacy of vaccination for the prevention of smallpox, now comes to the front end in the newspapers with the real preventative. "Any person who has been exposed demand have no fear of smallpox if he will take ii or three tablespoonfuls of pure cider vinegar three or four times a day." The discussion may now be regarded as closed, and smallpox at concluding is conquered![42]

Apple cider vinegar might seem lightheaded, but only because most people have been conditioned to have the historic period-sometime prophylaxis for smallpox: raw, disease-laden, contaminated pus scrapings from an infected beast'south (usually a cow) abdomen, diluted in glycerin, and scratched into the man arm with a metallic prong until the arm was raw and bleeding. What seems sillier now?

Scurvy is a illness that results from a deficiency of vitamin C due to starvation or simply an extremely poor or unbalanced diet. Vitamin C is essential for the formation of healthy collagen. Collagen is the protein that forms connective tissue in peel, bones, and blood vessels and also gives support to internal organs. In scurvy, the body is not able to generate adequate collagen or extracellular matrix proteins that serve equally mortar holding cells together and, as a result, literally comes unglued and falls apart.

William A. Guy, dean of the Medical Department of Rex's College, described the poor diet of gold miners in California in the 1850s. Thousands of miners subsisted on meat, fat, coffee, and alcohol while working long, difficult days under the unrelenting California dominicus. The vitamin C-deficient nutrition led many to develop scurvy.

Scurvy has been very prevalent among the gold miners of California . . . the emigrants upon the overland journeys and at the mines, every bit living most entirely upon fried bacon or fat pork and flour fabricated into batter-cakes, and fried in the fat, which completely saturates it. This is washed down with copious librations of strong java, and large quantities of brandy or whiskey are taken in the intervals of the meals . . . this has been the diet of thousands for months, under a scorching sun, when the temperature was over a hundred in the shade, the men beingness at the same time subjected to the nearly intense labour.[43]

Although many died of cholera during the California Gold Blitz of the mid-1800s, an estimated 10,000 men died from scurvy.

During the American Civil War twice as many died from nutritional deficiency related diseases as those killed in battle.[44] For case, the causes of death listed for Indiana soldiers buried at the National Cemetery in Andersonville, Georgia, shows that diarrhea and scurvy direct accounted for at least 2-thirds.[45] Dysentery was the next common cause of death, with the infamous diseases such as smallpox, typhus, pneumonia, and gangrene responsible for only a minor fraction. Those who were killed in bodily boxing or who died as a consequence of their wounds accounted only for one per centum of the total deaths.

Other large infectious killers such as reddish fever, measles, diphtheria, and whooping coughing (also known as pertussis) all greatly declined during this time to where they were either completely eliminated or considered balmy childhood illnesses past the mid-1900s. This massive decline of 99% of deaths in whooping coughing and measles occurred before vaccines or antibiotics were available (Graph v & 6).

Graph 5: England and Wales whooping cough mortality rate from 1838 to 1978.

Graph vi: England and Wales measles mortality rate from 1838 to 1978.

The fairytale fable of a state doctor making a discovery that saved the world from the devastation of smallpox is a fundamental medical belief that continues to be echoed by indoctrinated and naïve doctors whenever vaccines are challenged. Smallpox vaccine, in the minds of medical professionals remains a pillar of their vaccine religion. But the truthful history shows us a different reality.

The brand proper name of vaccination was indoctrinated into the earth psyche every bit something to protect someone from an illness. This conventionalities spawned off numerous other ideas using the same notion of injecting whole or parts of disease affair into living beings in attempts to protect them from a specific affliction. The reality of vaccination is nix close to the myth.

Other extremely effective culling methods of sanitation, nutrition, apple cider vinegar, and other solutions were ignored and have since vanished from societal collective retentivity. Instead we were left with the mythical history of Jenner'southward not bad discovery and the continued onslaught of dangerous vaccines to newborn infants. Vaccines are now a regular thing from cradle to grave, all in the name of supposedly healthier people. Now that the drapery has been pulled dorsum on the origins of vaccination, do more and more vaccines seem similar a practiced thought to you?

More than information on the history of vaccination including polio, measles, whooping cough, and lost remedies can be establish in Dr Humphries' and Roman Bystrianyk'southward book "Dissolving Illusions" which tin be institute on amazon.com

Bibliography:
one.Seth Mnookin, The Panic Virus, Simon & Schuster, 2011, p. 31.
2.Science the Definitive Visual Guide, DK Publishing, 2009, p. 156.
three.Victor C. Vaughan, MD, Epidemiology and Public Health, St. Louis, C.V. Mosby Visitor, 1922, p. 189.
iv.Frederick F. Cartwright, Affliction and History, Rupert-Hart-Davis, London, 1972, p. 124.
5.William Douglass, MA, A Summary, Historical and Political, of the First Planting, Progressive Improvements and Present State of the British Settlements of Northward-America, London, 1760, p. 398.
6.Ann Jannetta, The Vaccinators: Smallpox Medical Knowledge and the 'Opening' of Japan, Stanford University Press, 2007, p.179.
7."The Practice of Inoculation Truly Stated," The Gentleman'due south Magazine and Historical Chronicle, vol. 34, 1764, p. 333.
viii.Dr. Walter Hadwen, The Case Against Vaccination, Goddard'southward Rooms, Gloucester, January 25, 1896, p. 12.
9.Charles Creighton, Jenner and Vaccination, 1889, pp. 95-96.
10.William Scott Tebb, MD, A Century of Vaccination and What it Teaches, Swan Sonnenschein & Co., London, 1898, p. 126.
11."Vaccination by Act of Parliament," Westminster Review, vol. 131, 1889, p. 101.
12."Observations on Prevailing Diseases," The London Medical Repository Monthly Periodical and Review, vol. VIII, July-December, 1817, p. 95.
xiii.Mr. Thomas Chocolate-brown, Surgeon Musselburgh, "On the Present State of Vaccination," The Edinburgh Medical and Surgical Journal, Volume Fifteenth, 1819, p. 67.
fourteen."Observations by Mr. Fosbroke," The Lancet, vol. II, 1829, p. 583.
xv.William Cobbett, Advice to Immature Men and (Incidentally) to Young Women, 1829, London, pp. 224-225.
16.Dr. Delagrange of Paris, "On the Present State of Vaccination in French republic," The Lancet, vol. Ii, 1829, p. 582.
17."Cowpox Origin of," The Md-chirurgical review and journal of practical medicine, vol. twenty, 1834, p. 504.
18.Dr. Fiard, "Experiments upon the Communication and Origin of Vaccine Virus," London medical and surgical journal, vol. four, 1834, p. 796.
19.Ephraim Cutter, MD, "Fractional Report on the Production of Vaccine Virus in the U.s.a.," Transactions of the American Medical Association, vol. XXIII, 1872, p. 200.
20.Encyclopaedia Britannica, vol. 24, Philadelphia, 1890, p. 25.
21.The Morning Relate, Wednesday, April 12, 1854.
22."Vaccination," New York Times, September 26, 1869.
23.Susan Wade Peabody, "Historical Study of Legislation Regarding Public Wellness in the Country of New York and Massachusetts," The Journal of Infectious Diseases, Supplement no. 4, February 1909, p. 50-51.
24."Pocket-size-pox and Revaccination," Boston Medical and Surgical Journal, vol. CIV, no. 6, Feb x, 1881, p. 137.
25.Dr. Olesen, "Vaccination in the Philippine Islands," Medical Spotter, Apr 1911, vol. 19, no. 4, p. 255.
26."Vaccination," New York Times, September 26, 1869.
27.G. West. Harman, Md, "A Md's Statement Against the Efficacy of Virus Inoculation," Medical Cursory: A Monthly Journal of Scientific Medicine and Surgery: vol. 28, no. i, 1900, p. 84.
28.The Parliamentary Debates, vol. CCCXXVI, June 1, 1888, p. 933.
29."A Demonstration Against Vaccination," Boston Medical and Surgical Journal, April xvi, 1885, p. 380.
30.J. West. Hodge, MD, "Prophylaxis to be Realized Through the Attainment of Health, Non past the Propagation of Disease," The St. Louis Medical and Surgical Journal, vol. LXXXIII, July 1902, p. 15.
31.J. Westward. Hodge, MD, "How Small-Pox was Banished from Leicester," Twentieth Century Magazine, vol. III, no. 16, January, 1911, p. 342.
32.Charles Five. Chapin, "Variation in Blazon of Infectious Disease as Shown by the History of Smallpox in the United states of america," The Periodical of Infectious Diseases, vol. 13, no. ii, September 1913, p. 173.
33.John Gerald Fitzgerald, Peter Gillespie, Harry Mill Lancaster, An introduction to the do of preventive medicine, C.V. Mosby Company, 1922, p. 197.
34.John Cost Crozer Griffith, The diseases of infants and children, Book i, West.B. Saunders Company, 1921, p. 370.
35.Audrey H. Reynolds MD and Howard A. Joos MD, Exczema Vaccinatum, Pediatrics, August 1958, pp. 259-267
36.David Koplow, Smallpox: The Right to Eradicate a Global Scourge, 2004, Academy of California Press, p.21.
37.The Yale journal of biology and medicine, 1968, vol. 41, p. x.
38.Maggie Flim-flam, 2007, Toddler Survives Smallpox Vaccine Reaction, Reuters.
39.Dr. Charles Cyril Okell, "From a bacteriological back-number," Lancet, January i, 1938, pp. 48-49.
twoscore."Acetic Acrid in Cherry Fever," American homoeopathist—A Monthly Journal of Medical Surgical and Sanitary Science, vol. one, no. one, July 1877, p. 73.
41."Vinegar to Prevent Smallpox," The Critique, January 15, 1899, p. 289.
42.Cleveland Journal of Medicine, vol. Vi, no. one, 1901, p. 58.
43.William A. Guy, "Lectures on Public Health. Addressed to the Students of the Theological Department of King'southward College," Medical Times, vol. 23, January 4 to June 28, 1851, p. 283.
44.Roy Porter, The Greatest Do good to Flesh, Harper Collins, New York, 1997, p. 399.
45.Report of the Unveiling And Dedication of Indiana Monument at Andersonville, Georgia (National Cemetery), November 26 1908, pp. 73-102.

Filed nether: ADHD, Aspergers, autism, Child Health Prophylactic, MMR, vaccination, vaccine, vaccine court, Vaccine Impairment, Vaccines | Tagged: ADHD, Anti-vaccine Safety, Aspergers, autism, Cervarix, Gardasil, authorities, Health, HPV, HPV vaccine, medicine, mercury, MMR, politics, science, thimerosal, thiomersal, vaccination, vaccine, vaccine court, Vaccine Damage, Vaccines |

raderfeent1980.blogspot.com

Source: https://childhealthsafety.wordpress.com/2013/12/23/smallpox-eradication-one-of-historys-biggest-lies-how-vaccination-did-not-eradicate-smallpox/

Share this post